本文へ移動
Flalingo

英語の練習

TOEFL iBT Readingの復習:三つの問題形式の誤答を根拠の確認で直す方法

Two adult learners work together at a university study table.

2026年に導入されたTOEFL iBTの形式でReadingの誤答を見直す方法:単語の手がかり、お知らせと個人あての返信の区別、研究結果と言い過ぎの主張の区別。中上級(B2)以上の方向け。

TOEFL iBT Readingの誤答を見直すときは、まずその問題がどんな根拠を求めていたかを見極め、その根拠で答えを確かめます。Complete the Wordsでは、単語が印刷された文字を残し、文法に合っていなければなりません。Read in Daily Lifeでは、行動がお知らせと個人あての返信の両方の条件を満たす必要があります。Read an Academic Passageでは、結論が研究で実際に測ったことの範囲を超えてはいけません。この記事は2026年のTOEFL iBTの形式に基づき、中上級(B2)以上の受験者に向けて書きました。

この記事が向いている人

  • 2026年形式のTOEFL iBT Readingの三つの問題形式をすべて解いてみたものの、理由が分からないまま答えを落とし続けている受験者。
  • 話題は理解できても、印刷された文字に合わない単語を書いたり、広すぎる結論を選んだりする学習者。
  • 読解の判断を、明確で慎重な英語で説明できるようになりたい大学進学予定の方。
  • まだ早い:各Reading問題をまだ一つずつ練習していない場合は、Complete the Wordsと日常のお知らせの問題から始めましょう(下のリンク)。
  • 簡単すぎる:すべての読解の答えを引用した一文で裏づけられるなら、Listeningに進み、適切な応答を選ぶ問題から始めましょう(下のリンク)。

サンプルページを開く

サンプルページを開く

追加の練習

Reconstruct with guided endings

At a neighbourhood repair café, volunteers first exa____ each broken object. They keep a written rec___ of the problem so that another helper can follow the work. Visitors also learn how to prev___ similar damage in the future.

  1. Complete exa____ in the paragraph.

    exa______

    答えと解説を見る

    mine

    Examine is a verb meaning inspect; volunteers examine each object. Example and exactly do not fit this verb position.

  2. Complete rec___ in the paragraph.

    rec______

    答えと解説を見る

    ord

    A written record stores details of the problem. Recipe and recent do not match both the surviving letters and this meaning.

  3. Complete prev___ in the paragraph.

    prev______

    答えと解説を見る

    ent

    Prevent damage means stop it happening; preview and prevail do not express that action.

Reconstruct without options

A small neighbourhood group opened a shelf where residents could exchange household items. At first, people left objects without any information, so visitors were unsure whether they worked. The organisers introduced a simple sys___ for labelling each item. Owners now des_____ its condition and mention any missing parts. A volunteer che___ the labels each morning and moves damaged objects to a separate box. This does not gua______ that every item will last, but it gives visitors clearer information. The group also asks people to ret___ anything they decide not to use, so another neighbour has the opportunity to try it.

Explain and transfer your reconstruction

A small neighbourhood group opened a shelf where residents could exchange household items. At first, people left objects without any information, so visitors were unsure whether they worked. The organisers introduced a simple system for labelling each item. Owners now describe its condition and mention any missing parts. A volunteer checks the labels each morning and moves damaged objects to a separate box. This does not guarantee that every item will last, but it gives visitors clearer information. The group also asks people to return anything they decide not to use, so another neighbour has the opportunity to try it.

Cross-check a notice and a reply — worked strategy

Two adult learners work together at a university study table.

Example: A notice says visitors need a booking reference. A personal reply confirms that a printed or digital copy is acceptable. The reply explains the form of proof; it does not remove the need for proof. Read both levels of information before deciding what someone should do.

Find the supported meaning

Community tool library — collection update

From Monday 14 September, reserved tools will be collected at the side desk rather than the main counter. Opening hours remain 4–7 p.m. on weekdays. Wait for a message saying that your item is ready before travelling; a reservation confirmation alone is not a collection notice. If you cannot collect an item within two working days of the ready message, reply to that message to request an extension. Extensions depend on whether someone else is waiting.

Reply from the library to Alex: Your drill is ready today, Tuesday 15 September. We can hold it through Thursday evening. You asked whether your colleague can collect it: that is possible if they show the collection code and your name. The code is in this message. Please do not share your account password.

  1. What has changed?

    答えと解説を見る

    The place where reserved tools are collected

    The update moves collection to the side desk and explicitly keeps hours unchanged.

  2. Which message tells a member to travel?

    答えと解説を見る

    A message that the item is ready

    The notice distinguishes a ready message from a reservation confirmation.

  3. How long will Alex’s drill be held under the stated arrangement?

    答えと解説を見る

    Through Thursday evening

    The personal reply expressly states Thursday evening.

Explain connections and limits

Community tool library — collection update

From Monday 14 September, reserved tools will be collected at the side desk rather than the main counter. Opening hours remain 4–7 p.m. on weekdays. Wait for a message saying that your item is ready before travelling; a reservation confirmation alone is not a collection notice. If you cannot collect an item within two working days of the ready message, reply to that message to request an extension. Extensions depend on whether someone else is waiting.

Reply from the library to Alex: Your drill is ready today, Tuesday 15 September. We can hold it through Thursday evening. You asked whether your colleague can collect it: that is possible if they show the collection code and your name. The code is in this message. Please do not share your account password.

  1. What must Alex’s colleague show?

    答えと解説を見る

    The collection code and Alex’s name

    The reply gives those two requirements and warns against password sharing.

  2. What affects whether an extension is available?

    答えと解説を見る

    Whether another person is waiting for the item

    Extension availability depends on another waiting borrower.

  3. What is the purpose of the personal reply?

    答えと解説を見る

    Confirm availability and answer a collection question

    The reply confirms the drill is ready and explains collection by a colleague.

Review evidence and transfer

Community tool library — collection update

From Monday 14 September, reserved tools will be collected at the side desk rather than the main counter. Opening hours remain 4–7 p.m. on weekdays. Wait for a message saying that your item is ready before travelling; a reservation confirmation alone is not a collection notice. If you cannot collect an item within two working days of the ready message, reply to that message to request an extension. Extensions depend on whether someone else is waiting.

Reply from the library to Alex: Your drill is ready today, Tuesday 15 September. We can hold it through Thursday evening. You asked whether your colleague can collect it: that is possible if they show the collection code and your name. The code is in this message. Please do not share your account password.

Your open task

  • Explain which details come from the general notice and which from Alex’s reply.
  • Compose a polite request for an extension using an imagined reason.
  • State one habit that prevents a misleading inference.

Separate a result from a broad claim — worked strategy

Two adult learners work together at a university study table.

Example: A class recalls more facts after one illustrated handout, but the handout also uses simpler wording. The result supports a benefit from that version; it does not isolate pictures as the only cause. Name what was actually compared before claiming why the result occurred.

Find the supported meaning

A teaching team wanted to know whether short headings could help students use an online course guide. In a small classroom project, twenty students from one class were randomly given one of two versions of the same guide. The versions contained identical sentences, but one divided the information under descriptive headings. Students then looked for information about attendance, assignment deadlines and feedback. Those with headings located the deadline more quickly on average. The groups took similar amounts of time to find the attendance rule.

The team suggested that headings may help when readers can connect a question with a clear category. However, the results did not show that headings improve every reading task. Only one guide and one group of students were studied, and faster searching does not necessarily mean deeper understanding. A later project could use different guides and ask students to explain the rules after finding them. That would help distinguish quick location of information from understanding what it requires.

  1. What is the main focus of the passage?

    答えと解説を見る

    A limited investigation of how headings affect information finding

    The project compares two versions of one guide and reports a limited search benefit.

  2. What stayed the same across the two guide versions?

    答えと解説を見る

    The sentences containing the information

    The passage states that both versions contained identical sentences.

  3. Which result was reported?

    答えと解説を見る

    The heading group found the deadline more quickly on average

    Deadline finding was faster; comprehension was not measured as improved.

Explain connections and limits

A teaching team wanted to know whether short headings could help students use an online course guide. In a small classroom project, twenty students from one class were randomly given one of two versions of the same guide. The versions contained identical sentences, but one divided the information under descriptive headings. Students then looked for information about attendance, assignment deadlines and feedback. Those with headings located the deadline more quickly on average. The groups took similar amounts of time to find the attendance rule.

The team suggested that headings may help when readers can connect a question with a clear category. However, the results did not show that headings improve every reading task. Only one guide and one group of students were studied, and faster searching does not necessarily mean deeper understanding. A later project could use different guides and ask students to explain the rules after finding them. That would help distinguish quick location of information from understanding what it requires.

  1. What does distinguish mean in the final sentence?

    答えと解説を見る

    Recognise a difference between two things

    The proposed work separates quick finding from understanding.

  2. Which conclusion is NOT supported?

    答えと解説を見る

    The findings establish that headings help every reader on every task

    The authors explicitly limit generalisation beyond one guide and class.

  3. Why ask students to explain the rules in a later project?

    答えと解説を見る

    To examine understanding as well as search speed

    Explanation would test meaning beyond finding the relevant location.

Review evidence and transfer

A teaching team wanted to know whether short headings could help students use an online course guide. In a small classroom project, twenty students from one class were randomly given one of two versions of the same guide. The versions contained identical sentences, but one divided the information under descriptive headings. Students then looked for information about attendance, assignment deadlines and feedback. Those with headings located the deadline more quickly on average. The groups took similar amounts of time to find the attendance rule.

The team suggested that headings may help when readers can connect a question with a clear category. However, the results did not show that headings improve every reading task. Only one guide and one group of students were studied, and faster searching does not necessarily mean deeper understanding. A later project could use different guides and ask students to explain the rules after finding them. That would help distinguish quick location of information from understanding what it requires.

Your open task

  • Explain a result and a limit in different sentences.
  • Suggest one useful additional observation and explain its purpose.
  • Summarise the study for a learner who has not read it.
この単元を学ぶ
どの方法で学びますか?
アカウントをお持ちですか?

無料アカウントで1つの単元をずっと開いておけます。

確認1:単語を正確に復元する

話題に合う単語というだけでは足りません。印刷された文字をすべて残し、空所をちょうど埋め(ここでは下線一つが一文字)、文に合う必要があります。“volunteers first exa____ each broken object”には動詞しか入らないため、exampleやexactlyではなくexamineが正解です。

選択肢がないときは、文法が答えを決めます。近所の人が物を交換し合う棚についての段落から、空所を五つ見てみましょう。

  • “a simple sys___ for labelling each item”:system。“a simple”のあとには名詞が来ます。
  • “Owners now des_____ its condition”:describe。主語が複数なので-sは付きません。
  • “A volunteer che___ the labels each morning”:checks。現在形(present simple)で主語が三人称単数なら、動詞に-sが付きます。
  • “This does not gua______ that every item will last”:guarantee。“does not”のあとは動詞の原形です。
  • “asks people to ret___ anything”:return。“to”のあとは動詞の原形です。

確認2:全体へのお知らせと個人あての返信を分ける

日常的な文章では、全員に向けたお知らせと一人に向けた返信が組になっていることがよくあります。返信はルールを当てはめたり詳細を加えたりするもので、ルールを取り消すことはまれです。必要な予約番号について、印刷したものでもデジタルのコピーでもよいという返信は、証明の形を変えるだけで、証明が必要なことは変えません。

地域の工具ライブラリーが変更のお知らせを出し、続いてAlexという会員に返信します。

  • お知らせ:受け取り場所がサイドデスクに変わり、平日の開館時間は午後4~7時のままです。
  • お知らせ:準備完了の連絡を待つ必要があります。“a reservation confirmation alone is not a collection notice”。
  • お知らせ:“If you cannot collect an item within two working days of the ready message, reply to that message to request an extension. Extensions depend on whether someone else is waiting.”
  • 返信:“Your drill is ready today, Tuesday 15 September. We can hold it through Thursday evening.”
  • 返信:同僚が受け取りコードとAlexの名前でドリルを受け取れますが、パスワードは決して共有しません。
期間の延長ができるかどうかは、何によって決まりますか?

確認3:研究結果と言い過ぎの主張を分ける

アカデミックな文章では、小規模な研究を紹介したあとで、その限界を述べることがよくあります。原因を判断する前に、何が比較されたのかを確かめましょう。イラスト入りの配布資料がより簡単な表現も使っていたなら、学生がより多く覚えていた結果をイラストだけのおかげとは言えません。

オンラインの授業ガイドについての文章では、あるクラスの学生20人が、文がまったく同じ二つの版のどちらかを無作為に受け取り、見出しがあるのは一方だけでした。mayやon averageのような慎重な表現は、そのまま残しましょう。

  • 結果:“Those with headings located the deadline more quickly on average. The groups took similar amounts of time to find the attendance rule.”
  • 限界:“Only one guide and one group of students were studied, and faster searching does not necessarily mean deeper understanding.”
  • 根拠がない、つまりNOT問題の正解:“The findings establish that headings help every reader on every task.”
  • 語彙:“distinguish quick location of information from understanding what it requires”のdistinguishは、二つのものを区別するという意味です。
自分に合った方法でこの単元を学ぶ

よくある間違い

日本語の動詞は主語の人称や数によって形が変わらないため、三人称単数の-sを落としやすくなります:one volunteer checks, two volunteers check。また“may help”を「役に立つ」と読むと、慎重さが消えてしまいます。正しくは「役に立つかもしれない」です。

  • 話題には合うが、文字には合わない単語を書くこと。
  • “does not”のあとに-sを残すこと。
  • 個人あての返信を、全員へのルールと考えること。
  • 予約の確認を受け取りの許可だと思い込むこと。
  • mayをwill、on averageをalwaysのように読むこと。

20分の復習ルーティン

練習セットを終えるたびに使いましょう。

  • 分類:誤答ごとに、単語、メッセージ、研究のどの根拠が必要だったかを書きます。
  • 引用:答えを決める一文を書き写し、手がかりに印を付けます。
  • 説明:正解がなぜ正しいのかを言います。“The gap follows ‘does not’, so it needs the base form ‘guarantee’.”
  • 分離:結果と限界を二つの文に分けます。“The heading group found the deadline faster on average. However, only one guide was tested.”
  • 応用:お知らせをもとに丁寧な依頼を書きます。“Would it be possible to collect the drill on Friday instead? I have to work late on Thursday.”

次のステップ

すべての答えを引用した一文で裏づけられるようになったら、この習慣をListeningに持ち込みましょう。適切な応答を選ぶ問題でも、大切なのは同じ問いです。正確には何が言われたのでしょうか。

よくある質問

2026年のTOEFL iBTのReadingにある三つの問題形式は何ですか?

Complete the Words(段落の中で欠けた文字を補う)、Read in Daily Life(お知らせなどの短い日常的な文章)、Read an Academic Passage(多肢選択問題が付いた短いアカデミックな文章)の三つです。

TOEFL読解の誤答はどう見直せばよいですか?

それぞれの問題が求めた根拠を見極め、正解を証明する一文を見つけ、自分の選択がなぜ違ったのかを書きましょう。

TOEFL読解の“not supported”とはどういう意味ですか?

もっともらしく聞こえても、本文にその内容を裏づける根拠がないという意味です。研究の範囲を超えた主張が典型的な例です。

FlalingoはTOEFLを運営する団体と提携しておらず、それらの団体から推奨や承認を受けていません。

この単元を学ぶ
どの方法で学びますか?
アカウントをお持ちですか?

無料アカウントで1つの単元をずっと開いておけます。

次は何をしましょうか?

Flaiで練習を続けよう

Flaiは、音声会話、訂正内容、レッスンレポートでスピーキング練習を支えるFlalingoのAIアプリです。

ライブの先生と学ぶ

Flalingoのレッスンでは、このような単元をライブの先生とマンツーマンで練習します。