본문으로 바로가기
Flalingo

영어 연습

OET Reading Part B: 직원 공지에서 대상, 허용, 예외를 정확히 읽는 법

Two colleagues sit at a table and read together; one points at a tablet while the other holds a document.

OET Reading Part B의 공지, 이메일, 정책 발췌문 문제 푸는 법: 누가 행동해야 하는지, must와 may의 차이, only after와 unless, 본문보다 과장된 선택지. B2 이상의 간호사와 의사를 위한 글.

OET Reading Part B에서는 공지, 이메일, 정책 발췌문처럼 의료 현장에서 쓰이는 짧은 글 여섯 개를 읽고, 글마다 선택지 세 개짜리 문제 하나에 답합니다. 많은 문제가 작은 단어에서 갈립니다. 메시지가 누구를 향하는지, 어떤 일이 의무인지 아니면 허용일 뿐인지, 무엇이 확인을 받은 뒤에만 바뀌는지, 어떤 예외가 적용되는지입니다. 오답은 대개 본문보다 한 걸음 더 나아가므로, 먼저 읽는 사람과 행동을 찾고 모든 제한 조건을 확인하세요. 이 글은 영어가 중상급(B2) 이상인 간호사와 의사를 위한 글입니다.

이 글이 맞는 분

  • Part B 글의 문장은 모두 이해하는데도 오답을 고르는 간호사와 의사.
  • 직원이 무엇을 해야 하는지 묻는 문제에서 must, should, may, do not need to를 헷갈리는 수험생.
  • 직접 직원 공지를 쓰며, 해당하는 사람이 제대로 행동하기를 바라는 전문가.
  • 아직 이릅니다: Part A에서 세부 정보를 찾는 데 아직 시간이 많이 걸린다면 Part A 가이드부터 시작하세요(아래 링크).
  • 너무 쉽습니다: Part B 답이 이미 안정적이라면 Part C의 글쓴이 견해로 넘어가세요(아래 링크).

예시 학습 페이지 열기

예시 학습 페이지 열기

단어 카드

Personal · your inbox

How many work messages do you receive on a typical day? How do you decide which ones to read carefully?

Useful: ‘I usually get around…’ · ‘I always read… first.’ · ‘If a message starts with…, I tend to…’

Personal · a missed message

Have you ever missed or misread an important message? What happened, and what would have prevented it?

Useful: ‘I didn’t realise that it applied to me until…’ · ‘It would have helped if…’ · ‘Since then, I…’

Professional practice · writing to colleagues

When you write to colleagues, how do you make sure the right people act and the others do not waste their time?

Useful: ‘I always make it clear who…’ · ‘I put the action in…’ · ‘I try not to…, unless…’

Big idea · information and attention

Is the constant flow of information in modern workplaces making people better informed, or simply less attentive?

Useful: ‘There’s a difference between having information and…’ · ‘I’d argue that…’ · ‘On balance, …’

대화 예시

How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

문장 형태

Only after

  • A later step depends on an earlier confirmation.
  • Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it. Preparing a draft is not permission to circulate it.

Unless

  • An exception leaves the general rule in force when the exception does not apply.
  • Use the main room unless the organiser confirms a change. A possible room problem is not itself a confirmed change.

May versus must

  • Permission and obligation are not the same.
  • Staff may request an alternative time. The sentence allows a request; it does not guarantee an alternative or require everyone to request one.

추가 연습

Read the information

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

Practice context

  • Two staff messages from a clinic. Each has one meaning question, as in a short workplace reading task.

Evidence questions

  • Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?
  • Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

Choose and justify with evidence

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

  1. Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?

    정답과 해설 보기

    Staff covering evening reception this month

    The audience includes regular or substitute evening cover, while daytime-only reception staff are excluded.

  2. Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

    정답과 해설 보기

    To make callback status accessible to other colleagues

    The message asks for a shared outcome entry so a covering colleague can see the status; it explicitly rejects repeating calls.

Read the information

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

Practice context

  • Two policy clarifications for a workplace training team.

Evidence questions

  • Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?
  • Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

Choose and justify with evidence

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

  1. Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?

    정답과 해설 보기

    Use the current approved list while reporting the pending check

    The notice requires continued use of the approved list until the changed details have been verified.

  2. Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

    정답과 해설 보기

    After the training team confirms the alternative

    Capacity must be checked and confirmation returned; sending the request is not enough.

Read the information

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

Practice context

  • Two workplace updates. Each includes background that could tempt a reader away from the main practical meaning.

Evidence questions

  • Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?
  • Update 2: What does the update require?

Choose and justify with evidence

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

  1. Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?

    정답과 해설 보기

    Reuse suitable folders after checking and updating the contents

    The instruction combines reuse with checking against the current list; both automatic replacement and unchecked reuse are rejected.

  2. Update 2: What does the update require?

    정답과 해설 보기

    Coordinate reminders by checking and updating the shared record

    The purpose is to prevent needless duplication while allowing justified further reminders; uncertainty should be checked with a colleague.

Model the strategy before practice

Keyword trap

  • A repeated topic word may belong to a rejected proposal.
  • The notice mentions buying new folders, then says existing folders can be reused. Buying is mentioned, but it is not the recommendation.

Preserve the limit

  • Do not turn a limited request into a general ban.
  • Avoid sending duplicate reminders is not the same as never sending a reminder.

Explain both sides

  • A useful justification says why one meaning fits and another does not.
  • The key preserves for this week; the alternative incorrectly calls it a permanent change.

Use the strategy in a new exchange

How can you reject a broad summary with evidence?

The update does not ban further reminders; it asks us to check the shared record so any further message has a clear purpose.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

Transfer brief

  • Create a short original update about reusing a resource or coordinating a message.
  • Offer one accurate summary and one deliberately overstated summary.
  • Discuss why the overstatement could lead to the wrong action.
  • Revise the original message to make its limit easier to see.

Two rounds

  • Plan your wording and priorities.
  • Speak naturally and respond to your partner’s question.
  • Exchange specific feedback and improve one part in a shorter retry.
이 단원 배우기
어떻게 배우고 싶나요?
계정이 있나요?

무료 계정은 한 단원을 계속 열어 둘 수 있습니다.

Part B 글은 어떤 모습일까요?

Part B 글은 직장에서 오가는 문서입니다. 브리핑 안내 공지, 공유 기록에 관한 이메일, 정책의 한 단락 같은 것입니다. 문제는 주로 글의 목적, 적용 대상, 직원이 해야 할 일을 묻습니다. 임상 지식은 필요 없고, 표현을 꼼꼼히 읽는 힘이 필요합니다.

읽는 사람과 목적부터 찾으세요

먼저 물어보세요. 누가 행동해야 하고, 글쓴이는 무엇을 원하나요? 대상은 보통 앞부분에서 정해진 뒤 넓어지거나 좁아집니다.

  • “For staff covering the evening desk this month”는 “for all reception staff”보다 좁은 집단입니다.
  • “Including anyone covering a shift for another person”은 대상을 넓힙니다. 다른 사람 대신 근무를 한 번만 서도 포함됩니다.
  • “Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend”는 대상을 다시 좁힙니다.
  • 목적: “Please record the outcome in the shared field”는 요청이고, “this message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls”는 요청하지 않는 것을 분명히 합니다.

Must, should, may, do not need to

문제는 글이 무엇을 요구하고 무엇을 허용하는지 자주 묻습니다. 그 근거가 조동사입니다.

  • Must, have to: 반드시 해야 함. “The coordinator must confirm the changed numbers.”
  • Should: 기대되는 행동. 공지에서는 정중한 지시로 쓰일 때가 많습니다. “A draft should not be sent to the wider staff group.”
  • May, can: 허용됨. 의무도 아니고 보장도 아닙니다. “Staff may request another session”은 자리를 약속하지 않습니다.
  • Do not need to: 하지 않아도 됨. “Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten.”
  • Must not: 하면 안 됨. “You don’t need to attend”(참석은 선택)는 “You must not attend”(참석 불가)와 다릅니다.

Only after, unless, until: 조건과 예외

조건은 어떤 단계를 언제 할 수 있는지, 예외는 규칙이 언제 적용되지 않는지를 말합니다. 둘 다 규칙 자체를 없애지는 않습니다.

  • “Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it.” 초안을 만들었다고 배포해도 되는 것은 아닙니다.
  • “Attend your confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative.” Unless는 “~하지 않는 한”이라는 뜻입니다. 요청은 승인이 아닙니다.
  • “Until then, the original place remains reserved.” Until은 상황이 바뀌는 시점을 표시합니다.
  • “If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list.” 기다린다고 확인 절차가 없어지지는 않습니다.

듣기: 약속하지 않고 허용하기

답변에서 may와 only after가 어떻게 함께 쓰이는지 주목하세요.

튜터 How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

수험생 You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

공지에 직원이 “may request another session”이라고 되어 있습니다. 의미를 그대로 지킨 답변은 무엇일까요?
나에게 맞는 방법으로 이 단원 배우기

키워드 함정과 과장된 선택지

오답은 거의 맞는 것처럼 보일 때가 많습니다. 본문의 단어를 반복하면서 범위를 바꾸기 때문입니다.

  • 버려진 아이디어: 공지가 새 폴더를 언급한 뒤 기존 폴더를 다시 쓸 수 있다고 말한다면 “order new folders”는 오답입니다.
  • 금지로 바뀐 제한: “avoid duplicate reminders”는 “never send another reminder”가 아닙니다.
  • 영구로 바뀐 임시 조치: “for this week”는 “from now on”이 아닙니다.

Part B에서 흔한 실수

연습 답안을 이 목록으로 점검하세요.

  • 본문의 단어를 가장 많이 반복하는 선택지를 고르는 것.
  • 대상을 넓히는 것: 본문은 한 집단만 말하는데 “all staff”로 읽는 것.
  • may를 must로, do not need to를 must not으로 읽는 것.
  • 요청이나 초안을 이미 확정된 것처럼 여기는 것.
  • 한국어 “-아/어야 하다”는 must와 should를 모두 옮길 때가 많으니 본문이 어느 쪽을 썼는지 표시하세요. “-지 않아도 된다”(do not need to)와 “-면 안 된다”(must not)의 차이도 영어에서 그대로 지키세요.

15분 Part B 루틴

모의고사에서 Part B 글 세 개를 골라 선택지를 가리세요.

  • 5분: 글마다 누가 행동하는지, 무엇을 하는지, 제한 조건이 무엇인지 적습니다.
  • 5분: 선택지를 보고 답을 고른 뒤 근거가 되는 단어에 밑줄을 긋습니다.
  • 5분: 오답마다 무엇을 바꿨는지 이름을 붙입니다. 대상, must나 may, 조건, 범위 중 무엇인가요?

다음 단계

동료에게 글을 쓸 때도 같은 정확성을 지키세요. 첫 줄에 대상 집단을 밝히고, 행동을 앞에 두고, 예외는 그것이 바꾸는 규칙 바로 옆에 두세요. 그다음 학습 파트너와 토론해 보세요. 직장에 끊임없이 오가는 메시지는 사람들이 더 많이 알게 할까요, 아니면 덜 주의하게 만들까요? “There’s a difference between having information and…”로 시작해 보세요.

Part C에서는 더 긴 글에서 글쓴이의 견해를 따라가고, Listening Part B는 같은 능력을 듣기에서 평가합니다.

자주 묻는 질문

OET Reading Part B에는 글이 몇 개 있나요?

짧은 직장 문서 여섯 개이고, 글마다 선택지 세 개짜리 문제가 하나씩 있습니다. Part B와 Part C를 합쳐 45분이고, Part A는 따로 15분입니다.

OET Reading은 간호사와 의사가 다른가요?

아니요. Reading은 모든 직종이 같고, 전문 지식이 없어도 풀 수 있습니다.

OET Reading 글에서 may는 무슨 뜻인가요?

허용된다는 뜻이며, 의무도 보장도 아닙니다. must는 반드시 해야 한다는 뜻이고, do not need to는 하지 않아도 된다는 뜻으로 must not(하면 안 됨)과 다릅니다.

Flalingo는 OET를 운영하는 기관과 제휴 관계가 없으며 해당 기관의 추천이나 승인을 받지 않았습니다.

이 단원 배우기
어떻게 배우고 싶나요?
계정이 있나요?

무료 계정은 한 단원을 계속 열어 둘 수 있습니다.

다음에는 무엇을 할까요?

Flai로 계속 연습하세요

Flai는 음성 대화, 교정 내용, 수업 보고서로 말하기 연습을 돕는 Flalingo의 AI 말하기 앱입니다.

라이브 선생님과 배우기

Flalingo 수업에서는 이런 단원을 라이브 선생님과 1:1로 연습합니다.