Skip to content
Flalingo

English practice

OET Reading Part B: how to read staff notices for audience, permission and exceptions

Two colleagues sit at a table and read together; one points at a tablet while the other holds a document.

How to answer OET Reading Part B questions on notices, emails and policy extracts: who must act, must versus may, only after and unless, and options that overstate the text. For nurses and doctors at B2 and above.

OET Reading Part B gives you six short texts from healthcare workplaces, such as notices, emails and policy extracts, with one three-option question each. Many questions turn on small words: who the message is for, whether something must or only may happen, and what changes only after a confirmation or unless an exception applies. Wrong options usually go further than the text, so find the reader and the action first, then check every limit. This guide is for nurses and doctors with upper-intermediate (B2) English or above.

Who this is for

  • Nurses and doctors who understand every sentence of a Part B text and still choose the wrong option.
  • Candidates who mix up must, should, may and do not need to when a question asks what staff are required to do.
  • Professionals who write staff messages themselves and want the right people to act on them.
  • Too early: if you still lose time finding details in Part A, start with the Part A guide (link below).
  • Too easy: if your Part B answers are already reliable, move on to the writer’s view in Part C (link below).

Open the sample pages

Open the sample pages

Word cards

Personal · your inbox

How many work messages do you receive on a typical day? How do you decide which ones to read carefully?

Useful: ‘I usually get around…’ · ‘I always read… first.’ · ‘If a message starts with…, I tend to…’

Personal · a missed message

Have you ever missed or misread an important message? What happened, and what would have prevented it?

Useful: ‘I didn’t realise that it applied to me until…’ · ‘It would have helped if…’ · ‘Since then, I…’

Professional practice · writing to colleagues

When you write to colleagues, how do you make sure the right people act and the others do not waste their time?

Useful: ‘I always make it clear who…’ · ‘I put the action in…’ · ‘I try not to…, unless…’

Big idea · information and attention

Is the constant flow of information in modern workplaces making people better informed, or simply less attentive?

Useful: ‘There’s a difference between having information and…’ · ‘I’d argue that…’ · ‘On balance, …’

Example exchange

How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

Language pattern

Only after

  • A later step depends on an earlier confirmation.
  • Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it. Preparing a draft is not permission to circulate it.

Unless

  • An exception leaves the general rule in force when the exception does not apply.
  • Use the main room unless the organiser confirms a change. A possible room problem is not itself a confirmed change.

May versus must

  • Permission and obligation are not the same.
  • Staff may request an alternative time. The sentence allows a request; it does not guarantee an alternative or require everyone to request one.

More practice

Read the information

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

Practice context

  • Two staff messages from a clinic. Each has one meaning question, as in a short workplace reading task.

Evidence questions

  • Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?
  • Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

Choose and justify with evidence

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

  1. Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?

    Show answer and explanation

    Staff covering evening reception this month

    The audience includes regular or substitute evening cover, while daytime-only reception staff are excluded.

  2. Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

    Show answer and explanation

    To make callback status accessible to other colleagues

    The message asks for a shared outcome entry so a covering colleague can see the status; it explicitly rejects repeating calls.

Read the information

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

Practice context

  • Two policy clarifications for a workplace training team.

Evidence questions

  • Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?
  • Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

Choose and justify with evidence

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

  1. Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?

    Show answer and explanation

    Use the current approved list while reporting the pending check

    The notice requires continued use of the approved list until the changed details have been verified.

  2. Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

    Show answer and explanation

    After the training team confirms the alternative

    Capacity must be checked and confirmation returned; sending the request is not enough.

Read the information

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

Practice context

  • Two workplace updates. Each includes background that could tempt a reader away from the main practical meaning.

Evidence questions

  • Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?
  • Update 2: What does the update require?

Choose and justify with evidence

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

  1. Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?

    Show answer and explanation

    Reuse suitable folders after checking and updating the contents

    The instruction combines reuse with checking against the current list; both automatic replacement and unchecked reuse are rejected.

  2. Update 2: What does the update require?

    Show answer and explanation

    Coordinate reminders by checking and updating the shared record

    The purpose is to prevent needless duplication while allowing justified further reminders; uncertainty should be checked with a colleague.

Model the strategy before practice

Keyword trap

  • A repeated topic word may belong to a rejected proposal.
  • The notice mentions buying new folders, then says existing folders can be reused. Buying is mentioned, but it is not the recommendation.

Preserve the limit

  • Do not turn a limited request into a general ban.
  • Avoid sending duplicate reminders is not the same as never sending a reminder.

Explain both sides

  • A useful justification says why one meaning fits and another does not.
  • The key preserves for this week; the alternative incorrectly calls it a permanent change.

Use the strategy in a new exchange

How can you reject a broad summary with evidence?

The update does not ban further reminders; it asks us to check the shared record so any further message has a clear purpose.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

Transfer brief

  • Create a short original update about reusing a resource or coordinating a message.
  • Offer one accurate summary and one deliberately overstated summary.
  • Discuss why the overstatement could lead to the wrong action.
  • Revise the original message to make its limit easier to see.

Two rounds

  • Plan your wording and priorities.
  • Speak naturally and respond to your partner’s question.
  • Exchange specific feedback and improve one part in a shorter retry.
Learn this unit
How would you like to learn?
Have an account?

A free account opens one unit for good.

What Part B texts look like

Part B texts are the paperwork of working life: a notice about a briefing, an email about a shared record, a paragraph from a policy. Questions often ask about a text’s purpose, who it applies to or what staff must do. You need no clinical knowledge, only careful reading.

Start with the reader and the purpose

Ask first: who must act, and what does the writer want? The audience is often set early, then widened or narrowed:

  • “For staff covering the evening desk this month” is narrower than “for all reception staff”.
  • “Including anyone covering a shift for another person” widens it: one cover shift is enough.
  • “Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend” narrows it again.
  • Purpose: “Please record the outcome in the shared field” is a request; “this message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls” clarifies what is not being asked.

Must, should, may, do not need to

Questions often ask what a text requires or allows, and the modal verb is your evidence:

  • Must, have to: required. “The coordinator must confirm the changed numbers.”
  • Should: expected; in notices it often works as a polite instruction. “A draft should not be sent to the wider staff group.”
  • May, can: allowed, but neither required nor guaranteed. “Staff may request another session” promises no place.
  • Do not need to: not required. “Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten.”
  • Must not: not allowed. “You don’t need to attend” (attending is optional) is not “You must not attend”.

Only after, unless, until: conditions and exceptions

A condition says when a step can happen; an exception says when the rule does not apply. Neither cancels the rule:

  • “Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it.” A draft is not permission to circulate it.
  • “Attend your confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative.” Unless means “except if”; asking is not agreement.
  • “Until then, the original place remains reserved.” Until marks the moment things change.
  • “If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list.” Waiting does not cancel the check.

Listen: allow without promising

Notice how the answer pairs may with only after.

Tutor How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

Candidate You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

A notice says staff “may request another session”. Which reply keeps its meaning?
Learn this unit your way

Keyword traps and overstated options

Wrong options are often almost right: they repeat the text’s words but change its scope.

  • A rejected idea: a notice mentions new folders, then says existing ones can be reused, so “order new folders” is wrong.
  • A limit turned into a ban: “avoid duplicate reminders” is not “never send another reminder”.
  • Temporary into permanent: “for this week” is not “from now on”.

Common Part B mistakes

Check your practice answers for these:

  • Choosing the option that repeats the most words.
  • Widening the audience: “all staff” when the text names one group.
  • Reading may as must, or do not need to as must not.
  • Treating a request or a draft as confirmed.
  • If your first language has one verb for must and should, mark which one the text uses.

A 15-minute Part B routine

Take three Part B texts from a practice test and cover the options:

  • 5 minutes: for each text, write who acts, what they do and the limit.
  • 5 minutes: uncover the options, choose and underline your evidence.
  • 5 minutes: for each wrong option, name what it changes: audience, must or may, a condition or the scope.

What comes next

Write to colleagues with the same precision: name the group first, put the action early and place each exception next to its rule. Then discuss with a study partner: does the flow of messages at work make people better informed or less attentive? Start with “There’s a difference between having information and…”

Part C follows a writer’s view across longer texts; Listening Part B tests these skills in speech.

Frequently asked questions

How many texts are in OET Reading Part B?

Six short workplace texts, one three-option question each. Parts B and C share 45 minutes; Part A has its own 15.

Is OET Reading different for nurses and doctors?

No. Reading is the same for every profession and needs no specialist knowledge.

What does may mean in an OET Reading text?

Allowed, but neither required nor guaranteed. Must means required; do not need to means not required, which is different from must not.

Flalingo is not affiliated with or endorsed by the organisations that administer OET.

Learn this unit
How would you like to learn?
Have an account?

A free account opens one unit for good.

What comes next?

Keep practising with Flai

Flai is Flalingo's AI speaking-practice app, with voice conversations, corrections and lesson reports to guide your practice.

Learn with a live teacher

In Flalingo lessons you practise units like this one-to-one with a live teacher.