Przejdź do treści
Flalingo

Ćwiczenia z angielskiego

OET Reading Part B: jak czytać ogłoszenia dla personelu, by rozpoznać adresata, pozwolenie i wyjątek

Two colleagues sit at a table and read together; one points at a tablet while the other holds a document.

Jak odpowiadać na pytania OET Reading Part B o ogłoszenia, e-maile i fragmenty regulaminów: kto ma działać, must a may, only after i unless oraz opcje, które przesadzają. Dla pielęgniarek, pielęgniarzy i lekarzy na poziomie B2 i wyżej.

W OET Reading Part B czytasz sześć krótkich tekstów z placówek ochrony zdrowia, na przykład ogłoszenia, e-maile i fragmenty regulaminów, i do każdego odpowiadasz na jedno pytanie z trzema opcjami. Wiele pytań zależy od drobnych słów: do kogo skierowany jest komunikat, czy coś jest obowiązkowe, czy tylko dozwolone, co zmienia się dopiero po potwierdzeniu i jaki wyjątek obowiązuje. Błędne opcje zwykle idą dalej niż tekst, więc najpierw znajdź adresata i działanie, a potem sprawdź każde ograniczenie. Ten poradnik jest dla pielęgniarek, pielęgniarzy i lekarzy z angielskim co najmniej na poziomie średnio zaawansowanym wyższym (B2).

Dla kogo jest ten artykuł?

  • Pielęgniarki, pielęgniarze i lekarze, którzy rozumieją każde zdanie tekstu z Part B, a mimo to wybierają złą opcję.
  • Kandydaci, którym mylą się must, should, may i do not need to, gdy pytanie dotyczy tego, co personel musi zrobić.
  • Specjaliści, którzy sami piszą komunikaty do personelu i chcą, by działały właściwe osoby.
  • Za wcześnie: jeśli w Part A wciąż tracisz czas na szukanie szczegółów, zacznij od poradnika do Part A (link poniżej).
  • Za łatwe: jeśli twoje odpowiedzi w Part B są już pewne, przejdź do opinii autora w Part C (link poniżej).

Otwórz przykładowe strony

Otwórz przykładowe strony

Karty ze słowami

Personal · your inbox

How many work messages do you receive on a typical day? How do you decide which ones to read carefully?

Useful: ‘I usually get around…’ · ‘I always read… first.’ · ‘If a message starts with…, I tend to…’

Personal · a missed message

Have you ever missed or misread an important message? What happened, and what would have prevented it?

Useful: ‘I didn’t realise that it applied to me until…’ · ‘It would have helped if…’ · ‘Since then, I…’

Professional practice · writing to colleagues

When you write to colleagues, how do you make sure the right people act and the others do not waste their time?

Useful: ‘I always make it clear who…’ · ‘I put the action in…’ · ‘I try not to…, unless…’

Big idea · information and attention

Is the constant flow of information in modern workplaces making people better informed, or simply less attentive?

Useful: ‘There’s a difference between having information and…’ · ‘I’d argue that…’ · ‘On balance, …’

Przykładowa rozmowa

How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

Konstrukcja zdania

Only after

  • A later step depends on an earlier confirmation.
  • Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it. Preparing a draft is not permission to circulate it.

Unless

  • An exception leaves the general rule in force when the exception does not apply.
  • Use the main room unless the organiser confirms a change. A possible room problem is not itself a confirmed change.

May versus must

  • Permission and obligation are not the same.
  • Staff may request an alternative time. The sentence allows a request; it does not guarantee an alternative or require everyone to request one.

Więcej ćwiczeń

Read the information

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

Practice context

  • Two staff messages from a clinic. Each has one meaning question, as in a short workplace reading task.

Evidence questions

  • Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?
  • Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

Choose and justify with evidence

Message 1 — For staff covering evening reception

The coordinator will hold a short practical briefing on Tuesday before the evening desk opens. It is intended for colleagues who are covering that desk this month, including anyone covering a shift for another person. Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend. The briefing will explain where evening enquiries are recorded and whom to contact if a practical issue cannot be resolved at the desk. It will not introduce a new appointment system or change anyone’s roster. If you are scheduled for evening cover but cannot attend, contact the coordinator to arrange another way of receiving the information before your first evening shift.

Message 2 — Shared callback record

A review of last week’s callback work showed that most calls had been completed, but some outcomes were recorded only in personal emails. This makes it difficult for a colleague covering the desk to know whether a visitor has already received the requested practical information. From today, please put the outcome of each callback in the shared callback field as well as keeping any other record required by the existing process. Use a brief factual entry; there is no need to copy an entire conversation. This message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls. Its purpose is to make the current status visible to the next colleague who may need it.

  1. Message 1: Who is expected to receive the briefing information?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    Staff covering evening reception this month

    The audience includes regular or substitute evening cover, while daytime-only reception staff are excluded.

  2. Message 2: What is the main purpose of the instruction?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    To make callback status accessible to other colleagues

    The message asks for a shared outcome entry so a covering colleague can see the status; it explicitly rejects repeating calls.

Read the information

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

Practice context

  • Two policy clarifications for a workplace training team.

Evidence questions

  • Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?
  • Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

Choose and justify with evidence

Notice 1 — Circulating updated contact details

Draft contact lists are prepared by the administration team, but a draft should not be sent to the wider staff group. Before circulation, the service coordinator must confirm that the changed numbers and role titles are correct. Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten, although an obvious error should still be reported. If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list and tell the coordinator which change is awaiting a check. Please do not substitute a number found in an old personal email without verification. The purpose of this process is to keep a single dependable reference available, rather than creating several competing versions with different information.

Notice 2 — Alternative training attendance

Staff booked on the Friday workshop should attend their confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative. A colleague who has a timetable conflict may request another session through the shared training inbox. The request should identify the original booking and explain which available alternative would be suitable. Sending a request does not automatically transfer the booking. The team must check capacity and reply with confirmation before the colleague treats the change as agreed. Until then, the original place remains reserved. If no suitable alternative can be arranged, the team will discuss the next option directly with the colleague; staff should not offer their place to an unregistered person.

  1. Notice 1: What should happen if verification of a changed number is delayed?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    Use the current approved list while reporting the pending check

    The notice requires continued use of the approved list until the changed details have been verified.

  2. Notice 2: When does a requested attendance change become agreed?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    After the training team confirms the alternative

    Capacity must be checked and confirmation returned; sending the request is not enough.

Read the information

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

Practice context

  • Two workplace updates. Each includes background that could tempt a reader away from the main practical meaning.

Evidence questions

  • Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?
  • Update 2: What does the update require?

Choose and justify with evidence

Update 1 — Preparing the next learning session

Several colleagues asked whether new presentation folders were needed for the next session. The training team has checked the stock and confirmed that the existing folders can be reused if they are complete and in good condition. Please check the contents against the current session checklist, replacing only missing or outdated pages. There is no request to redesign the folders or order a new set for every participant. The checklist has changed in one section, so simply handing out last month’s folders without checking them would also be inappropriate. We want the preparation to be accurate and efficient: keep usable material, update what has changed and report any shortage through the shared list.

Update 2 — Appointment reminder coordination

Visitors have occasionally received two practical reminders for the same booking because different staff members could not see that another reminder had already been sent. The team is not stopping reminders. Instead, staff should check the shared reminder field before sending one and record the date when a reminder is completed. If the field is unclear, ask the colleague who last handled the booking before contacting the visitor again. A further reminder may still be appropriate when circumstances change, but it should be coordinated and its purpose clear. This update addresses unnecessary duplication; it does not create a rule that a visitor can never receive another message about the same appointment.

  1. Update 1: What is the intended approach to the folders?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    Reuse suitable folders after checking and updating the contents

    The instruction combines reuse with checking against the current list; both automatic replacement and unchecked reuse are rejected.

  2. Update 2: What does the update require?

    Pokaż odpowiedź i wyjaśnienie

    Coordinate reminders by checking and updating the shared record

    The purpose is to prevent needless duplication while allowing justified further reminders; uncertainty should be checked with a colleague.

Model the strategy before practice

Keyword trap

  • A repeated topic word may belong to a rejected proposal.
  • The notice mentions buying new folders, then says existing folders can be reused. Buying is mentioned, but it is not the recommendation.

Preserve the limit

  • Do not turn a limited request into a general ban.
  • Avoid sending duplicate reminders is not the same as never sending a reminder.

Explain both sides

  • A useful justification says why one meaning fits and another does not.
  • The key preserves for this week; the alternative incorrectly calls it a permanent change.

Use the strategy in a new exchange

How can you reject a broad summary with evidence?

The update does not ban further reminders; it asks us to check the shared record so any further message has a clear purpose.

One possible formulation; other coherent and accurate responses are welcome.

Transfer brief

  • Create a short original update about reusing a resource or coordinating a message.
  • Offer one accurate summary and one deliberately overstated summary.
  • Discuss why the overstatement could lead to the wrong action.
  • Revise the original message to make its limit easier to see.

Two rounds

  • Plan your wording and priorities.
  • Speak naturally and respond to your partner’s question.
  • Exchange specific feedback and improve one part in a shorter retry.
Poznaj ten rozdział
Jak chcesz się uczyć?
Masz już konto?

Darmowe konto otwiera na stałe jeden rozdział.

Jak wyglądają teksty w Part B

Teksty w Part B to codzienna dokumentacja w pracy: ogłoszenie o odprawie, e-mail o wspólnym rejestrze, akapit z regulaminu. Pytania często dotyczą celu tekstu, tego, kogo dotyczy, albo tego, co personel ma zrobić. Wiedza kliniczna nie jest potrzebna; potrzebne jest uważne czytanie sformułowań.

Zacznij od adresata i celu

Najpierw zapytaj: kto ma działać i czego chce autor? Adresat jest zwykle określony na początku, a potem grupa się poszerza albo zawęża:

  • “For staff covering the evening desk this month” to węższa grupa niż “for all reception staff”.
  • “Including anyone covering a shift for another person” ją poszerza: wystarczy jeden dyżur w zastępstwie.
  • “Staff who work only at daytime reception do not need to attend” znowu ją zawęża.
  • Cel: “Please record the outcome in the shared field” to prośba; “this message does not ask staff to repeat completed calls” wyjaśnia, czego się nie oczekuje.

Must, should, may, do not need to

Pytania często dotyczą tego, czego tekst wymaga, a na co pozwala, a dowodem jest czasownik modalny:

  • Must, have to: obowiązek. “The coordinator must confirm the changed numbers.”
  • Should: to, czego się oczekuje; w ogłoszeniach często działa jak uprzejme polecenie. “A draft should not be sent to the wider staff group.”
  • May, can: dozwolone, ale ani obowiązkowe, ani zapewnione. “Staff may request another session” nie obiecuje miejsca.
  • Do not need to: nie trzeba. “Unchanged entries do not need to be rewritten.”
  • Must not: nie wolno. “You don’t need to attend” (udział jest dobrowolny) to nie to samo co “You must not attend” (udział jest niedozwolony).

Only after, unless, until: warunki i wyjątki

Warunek mówi, kiedy można zrobić dany krok; wyjątek, kiedy zasada nie obowiązuje. Żadne z nich nie uchyla zasady:

  • “Share the new list only after the coordinator confirms it.” Przygotowanie wersji roboczej nie oznacza zgody na jej rozesłanie.
  • “Attend your confirmed session unless the training team agrees an alternative.” Unless znaczy „chyba że”: prośba to jeszcze nie zgoda.
  • “Until then, the original place remains reserved.” Until wyznacza moment, w którym sytuacja się zmienia.
  • “If a confirmation is delayed, continue to use the current approved list.” Czekanie nie zwalnia ze sprawdzenia.

Posłuchaj: pozwolić, nie obiecując

Zwróć uwagę, jak odpowiedź łączy may z only after.

Nauczyciel How can you clarify permission without promising an outcome?

Kandydat You may request a different session, but the change is agreed only after the team confirms a place.

Ogłoszenie mówi, że personel “may request another session”. Która odpowiedź zachowuje to znaczenie?
Poznaj ten rozdział po swojemu

Pułapki słów kluczowych i przesadzone opcje

Błędne opcje często wyglądają na prawie poprawne: powtarzają słowa z tekstu, ale zmieniają jego zakres.

  • Odrzucony pomysł: ogłoszenie wspomina o nowych teczkach, a potem mówi, że obecne można wykorzystać ponownie, więc “order new folders” jest błędne.
  • Ograniczenie zamienione w zakaz: “avoid duplicate reminders” to nie “never send another reminder”.
  • Coś tymczasowego zamienione w stałe: “for this week” to nie “from now on”.

Typowe błędy w Part B

Sprawdź swoje odpowiedzi próbne z tą listą:

  • Wybór opcji, która powtarza najwięcej słów z tekstu.
  • Poszerzanie grona adresatów: “all staff”, gdy tekst wymienia jedną grupę.
  • Czytanie may jak must albo do not need to jak must not.
  • Traktowanie prośby lub wersji roboczej jak czegoś już potwierdzonego.
  • Po polsku „nie musisz” i „nie wolno ci” to dwie różne rzeczy i po angielsku też: “you don’t need to” kontra “you must not”. Uważaj też na “eventually”: znaczy „w końcu”, a nie „ewentualnie”.

15-minutowa rutyna do Part B

Weź trzy teksty z Part B z jednego testu próbnego i zasłoń opcje:

  • 5 minut: przy każdym tekście zapisz, kto działa, co robi i jakie jest ograniczenie.
  • 5 minut: odsłoń opcje, wybierz i podkreśl w tekście swój dowód.
  • 5 minut: przy każdej błędnej opcji nazwij, co zmienia: adresata, must albo may, warunek czy zakres.

Następny krok

Pisz do współpracowników z tą samą precyzją: nazwij grupę w pierwszym zdaniu, umieść działanie na początku, a każdy wyjątek obok zasady, którą zmienia. Potem przedyskutuj z partnerem do nauki: czy ciągły strumień wiadomości w pracy sprawia, że jesteśmy lepiej poinformowani, czy tylko mniej uważni? Zacznij od “There’s a difference between having information and…”.

W Part C śledzisz opinię autora w dłuższych tekstach; Listening Part B sprawdza te same umiejętności w słuchaniu.

Najczęstsze pytania

Ile tekstów jest w OET Reading Part B?

Sześć krótkich tekstów z miejsca pracy, do każdego jedno pytanie z trzema opcjami. Part B i Part C mają łącznie 45 minut; Part A ma osobne 15.

Czy OET Reading różni się dla pielęgniarek i lekarzy?

Nie. Reading jest taki sam dla wszystkich zawodów i nie wymaga wiedzy specjalistycznej.

Co znaczy may w tekście z OET Reading?

Że coś jest dozwolone, ale ani obowiązkowe, ani zapewnione. Must oznacza obowiązek; do not need to oznacza brak obowiązku, a to nie to samo co must not.

Flalingo nie jest powiązane z organizacjami prowadzącymi OET ani przez nie rekomendowane.

Poznaj ten rozdział
Jak chcesz się uczyć?
Masz już konto?

Darmowe konto otwiera na stałe jeden rozdział.

Co dalej?

Ćwicz dalej z Flai

Flai to aplikacja Flalingo do ćwiczenia mówienia z AI. Oferuje rozmowy głosowe, korekty i raporty z lekcji, które pomagają ukierunkować naukę.

Nauka z lektorem na żywo

Na lekcjach Flalingo ćwiczysz takie rozdziały jeden na jeden z lektorem na żywo.